NLSI’s DREAM team modelers help search for Moon dust fountains In exploration, sometimes you find more than what you’re looking for, including things that shouldn’t be there. As the Apollo 17 astronauts orbited over the night side of the moon, with the sun just beneath the horizon right before orbital “sunrise,” Eugene Cernan prepared to make observations of sunlight scattered by the sun’s thin outer atmosphere and interplanetary dust from comets and collisions between asteroids. The idea was to have the moon block the brilliant direct sunlight so this faint glow, called Coronal and Zodiacal Light (CZL), could be seen. They should have seen a dim “hump” of light in the middle of the horizon that gradually grew in size and intensity until it was overwhelmed by sunrise. What came next was not supposed to happen.
This is a picture of coronal and zodiacal light (CZL) taken with the Clementine spacecraft, when the sun was behind the moon. The white area on the edge of the moon is the CZL, and the bright dot at the top is the planet Venus. Credit: NASA
Cernan did see the CZL glow, but it had a strange companion. A slim crescent of light appeared all along the horizon, and just before sunrise, faint rays appeared, similar to the columns of light seen on Earth when sunlight pokes through a hole in a layer of clouds. On Earth, the horizon glow seen at sunrise and sunset, and the rays, are created when sunlight scatters off atmospheric moisture and dust. But the moon has almost no atmosphere — its atmosphere is so thin, atoms and molecules there rarely collide with each other and it’s technically referred to as an “exosphere”. This thin atmosphere should not have produced the horizon glow seen.
The sighting during Apollo 17 was not just a one-time freak event. “Similar sightings were reported on Apollo 8, 10, and 15 during planned observations of coronal and zodiacal light,” says Dr. Timothy Stubbs of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., and the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
“Lunar horizon glow (LHG) was first observed between 1966 and 1968 by TV cameras aboard the Surveyor landers — robotic precursors to the manned Apollo landings — specifically Surveyor 5, 6 and 7, and possibly Surveyor 1,” adds Stubbs. While the Apollo observations detected LHG at high altitudes – extending up to around 100 kilometers (about 62 miles) above the lunar surface, the LHG recorded by the Surveyors was much lower – within about a meter (one yard) of the surface, according to Stubbs.
Deepening the mystery is that LHG was not always seen. “The astronauts on Apollo 11, 12, and 14 did not look for CZL; however, similar CZL observations were made during Apollo 16 by Ken Mattingly, but no LHG or ‘streamers’ were seen (to his great personal disappointment). Analyses of coronal photographs from Apollo 15 and 17 revealed an ‘excess brightness’ along the lunar horizon, which was interpreted as LHG produced by sunlight scattering off a high altitude ‘dust atmosphere’. Similar photographs taken during Apollo 16 did not contain any excess brightness (consistent with the astronaut observations). This indicates that LHG is a variable phenomenon – sometimes you see it, sometimes you don’t,” says Stubbs.
This is a sketch of the lunar sunrise seen from orbit by Apollo 17 astronaut Eugene Cernan. On the right, the sketch is highlighted to show the sources of the scattered light: red indicates Coronal and Zodiacal Glow, blue is the Lunar Horizon Glow, perhaps caused by exospheric dust, and green indicates possible “streamers” of light (crepuscular rays) formed by shadowing and scattered light. Credit: NASA
While dust can produce a LHG by scattering sunlight, the presence of even an intermittent high-altitude dust atmosphere was unexpected — the moon’s exosphere is far too thin for wind to blow and suspend dust. Although the moon is constantly bombarded by meteorites (mostly microscopic) that kick up dust, “the dust concentrations inferred from LHG are much higher than expected from debris ejected by meteorite impacts alone,” adds Stubbs.
It has long been suggested that lunar dust gets transported electrically. For example, on the day side of the moon, solar ultraviolet radiation is strong enough to kick electrons from dust particles in the lunar soil. Removal of electrons, which have a negative electric charge, leaves the dust with a positive electric charge. Since like charges repel, the positively charged dust particles get pushed away from each other, and the only direction not blocked by more dust is up.
The smaller particles likely get ejected higher because they are lighter. This might explain the different LHG observed by Surveyor and Apollo. The low-altitude glow seen by Surveyor appeared to be from larger, relatively heavy particles, while the high-altitude glow seen by Apollo astronauts was likely from the smallest particles. Small particles can get such a boost from the surface charge that they are lofted high above the surface and follow ballistic trajectories, returning to the surface under the influence of the moon’s gravity. This movement of the smallest particles could make fountains of moon dust.
However, much remains unknown about lunar dust and the LHG. “Only a handful of LHG observations have been made, so we really know very little about it,” says Stubbs. “The uncertainties associated with previous observations are largely because the instruments used were designed to measure something else.”
“The high altitude observations are particularly controversial. If LHG is present at high altitudes, then the suggestions are that it is produced either by sunlight scattering from dust, or by resonant scattering of sunlight from neutral sodium atoms in the exosphere. However, if sodium is producing the LHG, it should be seen up to altitudes in excess of 1,000 km (about 620 miles), but the LHG observed so far only appears to extend about 100 km (about 62 miles) above the horizon. Our predictions indicate that the LHG observations appear to be more consistent with the presence of exospheric dust.”
“It has been suggested that electrostatic forces play a role in the ejection of dust from the lunar surface, and its dynamics in the atmosphere, but we really don’t understand how it gets there in such high abundances. So far, LHG has only been observed near the region where day transitions to night, called the terminator, but it could well be occurring elsewhere. This begs the question: Is LHG (from atmospheric dust) a global phenomenon or is it confined to the terminator region?”
“We’re still at the stage of determining whether or not LHG is really there – this is one of the major objectives of the LADEE mission,” adds Stubbs.
As early as 2012, NASA could launch the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) spacecraft that will orbit the moon and look for the LHG and exospheric dust hinted at in the Apollo observations. LADEE will look for LHG using the Ultraviolet Spectrometer (UVS) instrument, which will measure the intensity of light at different wavelengths at a point above the lunar horizon. Each potential source – sodium or dust, for example — will produce a unique “signature” glow in ultraviolet and/or visible light.
LADEE may also be able to use its star-tracker navigation cameras to observe LHG, which would provide details on the shape of the visible light scattering sources, according to Stubbs. LADEE also has a dust detector instrument to record any hits from high-altitude dust.
To give the LADEE mission an idea of the best techniques and places to look for the LHG, Stubbs and his team recently created computer simulations of dust and sodium-generated glows. “The simulations show that if LHG is produced by dust, then it will be brightest in the forward scattering direction; that is, with the dust between the sun and the observer,” says Dr. David Glenar of New Mexico State University. “However, for this viewing geometry, the disk of the sun needs to be blocked (e.g., by the edge of the moon), so as not to be overwhelmed by its brightness. This is why LHG has previously only been observed from the shadow of the moon close to the terminator, and this is the initial approach that is planned for LADEE/UVS.”
These are simulations of optical scattering sources expected to be observed above the lunar sunrise horizon (at orbital sunset), as viewed by the LADEE star tracker cameras from within the shadow of the Moon. Shown from the top are intensities due to: lunar horizon glow (LHG), coronal and zodiacal light (CZL), emissions from sodium (Na) in the lunar exosphere, and all three sources combined (LHG + CZL + Na). Under these observing conditions, LHG and CZL have comparable intensities, whereas Na emissions will be negligible. Credit: NASA
“This modeling is important as it reassures us that, based on previous observations, the LADEE/UVS ought to be able to observe LHG and distinguish it from other scattering sources; i.e., it can satisfy one of its prime mission objectives. This model will be a valuable tool for analyzing and interpreting the complicated UVS scattering data in the future,” said Dr. Anthony Colaprete, NASA’s Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., Principal Investigator for the LADEE/UVS instrument.
“Future developments of the model will include the capability to characterize the shape, size, and structure of the scattering dust grains, which will let us probe even further into the nature of the processes at work at the lunar surface,” adds Dr. Denis Richard of NASA Ames and the San José State University Research Foundation.
Learning more about the strange lunar atmosphere with its potential fountains of sticky and abrasive moon dust is essential for future human exploration. “LHG could be telling us that the moon’s atmosphere is much dustier than is typically thought. It was well-reported that the Apollo astronauts found lunar dust to be a significant nuisance when exploring the moon, and it’s likely that these problems were exacerbated by electrostatic (static cling) effects. So a better understanding of the behavior of dust in the lunar environment would facilitate the development of more effective mitigation techniques,” says Stubbs.
“The scattering of sunlight by dust in the lunar atmosphere could mean that the moon is not as good a location for sensitive astronomical observations as has previously been assumed. This characteristic of the lunar environment needs to be well characterized before an informed judgment regarding the benefit of lunar-based telescopes can be made,” adds Stubbs.
The team includes researchers from NASA Goddard, NASA Ames, the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, N.M., San Jose State University, San Jose, Calif., and NASA’s Lunar Science Institute, which is managed by NASA Ames. Stubbs’ research was published in Planetary and Space Science in April, and was funded by the NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Participating Scientists program and the NASA Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research program. The LADEE mission and UVS instrument are funded by the NASA Science Mission Directorate.
Posted by: Soderman/NLSI Staff
Source: Bill Steigerwald
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center