NEO News is a newsletter about near earth asteroids and related topics. The opinions here are those of the author, David Morrison, and do not represent NASA or any other organization. You may quote or use these comments as long as you note the original source.
COMET SIDING SPRING ENCOUNTER WITH MARS
Comet Siding Spring came close enough to Mars that its visible coma barely brushed the planet. This is the closest comet encounter with either Earth or Mars ever observed. Several spacecraft in orbit around Mars observed the comet flyby.
Images were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on Oct. 19, 2014. Comet Siding Spring is on its first trip this close to the Sun from the Oort Cloud at the outer fringe of the solar system. This is the first resolved imaging of the nucleus of a long-period comet. [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA18618]
The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter acquired images of this comet from a minimum distance of about 138,000 kilometers, yielding a scale of about 150 meters per pixel. Telescopic observers had modeled the size of the nucleus as about one kilometer wide. However, the best HiRISE images show only two to three pixels across the brightest feature, probably the nucleus, suggesting a size less than half that estimate. [Morrison note: The bright feature in these images is probably the jets and might be considerably smaller than the dark nucleus, since we know from other comets like Halley that the jets often arise in just a part of the nucleus].
Here is a composite HST image of the comet as it passed Mars on October 19.
ROSETTA CLOSING IN ON COMET TARGET
A landing on comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko is expected on November 9. Meanwhile, here is an interesting press release from the University of Bern, Switzerland, on gases detected by mass spectrometers near the comet:
The Perfume of a Comet: How does a Comet Smell? Since early August the Rosetta Orbiter Spectrometer for Ion and Neutral Analysis (ROSINA) is sniffing the fumes of the comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko with its two mass spectrometers. The detected chemistry in the coma of the comet is surprisingly rich already at more than 400 million kilometers from the Sun. The perfume of this comet is quite strong, with the odor of rotten eggs (hydrogen sulphide), of horse stable (ammonia) and the pungent, suffocating odor of formaldehyde. This is mixed with the faint, bitter, almond-like aroma of hydrogen cyanide. Add some whiff of alcohol (methanol) to this mixture paired with the vinegar-like aroma of sulphur dioxide and a hint of the sweet aromatic scent of carbon disulphide and you arrive at the perfume of our comet. While this doesn’t probably make a very attractive perfume, remember that the density of these molecules is still very low and that the main part of the coma is made up of sparkling water (water and carbon dioxide molecules) mixed with carbon monoxide. “This all makes a scientifically enormously interesting mixture in order to study the origin of our solar system material, the formation of our Earth and the origin of life,” says Kathrin Altwegg from the Center of Space and Habitability (CSH) of the University of Bern.
Activity on the comet is increasing as shown by these photos of jets of gas and dust originating in the smooth “neck” region: [http://www.mps.mpg.de/3821092/PM_2014_10_23_Rosetta-Komet-spuckt-Staubfontaenen?c=2169]
Here is another spectacular close-up view of the neck section of the comet nucleus: [http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/files/2014/10/ESA_Rosetta_NAVCAM_141018_D.jpg]
NUKES FOR DEFENSE AGAINST ASTEROIDS?
Nuclear explosives have long been considered as a means of deflecting or disrupting an asteroid if there is insufficient time to use other deflection techniques. This recent article from the Wall Street Journal has stirred increased controversy about the role of nuclear explosives for planetary defense:
U.S. Takes Asteroid Threat Seriously – Some Nuclear Warheads, Once Set for Disassembly, Are Kept in Reserve
Wall Street Journal [http://online.wsj.com/articles/u-s-takes-asteroid-threat-seriously-141211,]
Sept. 30, 2014
Some U.S. nuclear-warhead components, scheduled for disassembly in the next year, have gotten at least a temporary new lease on life. The reason: possible use in defending the Earth against killer asteroids. That bit of information was tucked deep inside a 67-page Government Accountability Office report on the National Nuclear Security Administration, which manages the U.S. atomic-weapons arsenal. The warhead components, containing highly enriched uranium, are being retained “pending a senior-level government evaluation of their use in planetary defense against earthbound asteroids,” the April report said. An NNSA spokesman declined to comment.
Government officials and space scientists say we aren’t anywhere near a real-life replay of “Armageddon,” the 1998 science-fiction extravaganza in which actor Bruce Willis and friends used a nuclear weapon to smash apart a giant asteroid hurtling toward Earth. While hundreds of asteroids with a diameter of about a kilometer or bigger (the size that could “produce global devastation,” according to a 2010 National Research Council report) pass relatively near the Earth’s orbit, none are expected to be a worry for at least 100 years and probably much longer, they say. However, while no such mega-space rocks are on the horizon, an estimated 100,000 or more asteroids at least 50 meters in size also pass through Earth’s neighborhood, said Lindley Johnson, a program executive at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration who oversees the effort to find such “near-earth objects.” Probably no more than 5% of those objects have been catalogued so far, he said.
If a 100-meter-wide asteroid hit Washington, D.C., for instance, it “could wipe out everything inside the Beltway,” Mr. Johnson said. Global upheavals from a roughly 10-kilometer asteroid or comet striking near the Yucatan Peninsula 65 million years ago are believed by many scientists to have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs.
Early last year, an asteroid exploded in the skies near Chelyabinsk,
Russia. That object (estimated to be nearly 20 meters in size and carrying a force of more than 400,000 tons of TNT) injured several hundred people, mostly as a result of flying window glass and other debris. NASA estimates that more than 100 tons worth of tiny space debris hits Earth daily, much of it burning up in the atmosphere.
NASA and others are searching the skies for more potentially dangerous objects. Mr. Johnson said he would like to launch a space telescope with infrared-detection capability, which he estimates could locate more than 90% of the 100-meter-plus asteroids within a decade. But his $40 million annual detection budget, a tenfold increase from what it was for most of the past decade, isn’t large enough to accommodate the estimated $500 million satellite cost, he said.
One relatively low-cost new earthbound detection project known as the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System, or ATLAS, will use small telescopes and powerful cameras to scan the night sky. The NASA-funded effort, scheduled to be operational in Hawaii by the end of next year, aims to provide emergency planners with advance warning, ranging from a day to a few months, of an impending impact, said John Tonry, a University of Hawaii professor and head of ATLAS.
Government officials and scientists are also looking at ways to defend the planet, which is where nuclear weapons come in. A nuclear armed craft could be sent into deep space, where the atomic explosion would aim to alter the object’s course long before it got to Earth and without any fallout affecting the planet. However, some scientists say that in certain scenarios, radioactive asteroid debris from an explosion might intersect with Earth. Back on Earth, the U.S. government has detonated underground nuclear blasts for nonmilitary purposes, such as trying to stimulate natural-gas production. But such work stopped in the 1970s, according to the Energy Department.
“Any time you talk about nuclear weapons, it’s controversial,” said NASA’s Mr. Johnson. In an era when the size of the atomic-weapons stockpile has been shrinking as a result of arms-control treaties and other factors, asteroid defense “may be an excuse for keeping the nuclear arsenal together,” said Jay Melosh, a professor of earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences at Purdue University. But he thinks there are better, nonnuclear ways for defending the planet. Among possible options: a “gravity tractor” or an “impactor.” The former involves using the thrusters and the gravitational tug from the mass of a large space vehicle to change an asteroid’s course. The impactor, as its name suggests, would crash at high speed into the asteroid with the same purpose. However, some argue that such approaches would only work if the asteroid is small enough and seen soon enough. For larger objects and shorter response times, a nuclear explosion, because of the huge amount of energy it can deliver, “is the only option,” said Bong Wie, a professor and director of Iowa State University’s Asteroid Deflection Research Center.
ASTEROID MINING COMPANY PLANETARY RESOURCES LAUCHING FIRST SPACECRAFT
Planetary Resources’ launch of the Arkyd 3 engineering demonstrator will test not only the company’s technology but also its business model, using relatively low-cost approaches to explore space and ultimately mine lucrative natural resources from asteroids. The mission is part of the payload of an Orbital Sciences Antares rocket to be launched the International Space Station. [http://www.geekwire.com/2014/arkyd-3/]
Posted by: Soderman/SSERVI Staff
Source: Morrision/SSERVI Chief Scientist